Inhalt anspringen
EN

Veröffentlichungen

  • Vieregge, J., Sutter, C. & Sülzenbrück, S. (2023). How sensory processing sensitivity shapes employee reactions to core job Characteristics. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000415 (Öffnet in einem neuen Tab)
  • Göllner, V., Sülzenbrück, S., Sutter, C., Externbrink, K. (2021). Systemische Führung: Ein mehrdimensionales Messinstrument zur Erforschung eines neuen Führungskonstruktes. AOW-Konferenzabstract, Beitrag 319
  • Meinbreckse, D., Sülzenbrück, S., & Sutter, C. (2021). Persuasion in online media – The role of written emotional and moral language: A systematic review. AOW-Konferenzabstract, Beitrag 198
  • Kurtz, M., Oehl, M., & Sutter, C. (2021). “Just one short voice message” – Comparing the effects of text- vs. voice-based answering to text messages via smartphone on young drivers’ driving performances. Safety, 7, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety7030057 (Öffnet in einem neuen Tab)
  • Oehl, M. & Sutter, C. (2021). Fahrzeugautomatisierung als Garant für die Erhöhung der Sicherheit im Straßenverkehr? In Huckauf, A., Baumann, M., Ernst, M. Herbert, C. Kiefer, M, & Sauter, M. (Eds.): Contributions to the 63rd Tagung Experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (p. 183). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
  • Steffens, K., Sutter, C. & Sülzenbrück, S. (2021). Antecedents, processes and outcomes of Work-Life-Blending: A systematic review. AOW-Konferenzabstract, Beitrag 128.
  • Thiemann, M., Sutter, C., & Sülzenbrück, S. (2021). Investigating the Influence of Mindfulness Intervention on Knowledge Sharing in a High-Reliability Organization. In Huckauf, A., Baumann, M., Ernst, M. Herbert, C. Kiefer, M, & Sauter, M. (Eds.): Contributions to the 63rd Tagung Experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (p. 246). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
  • Willeke, P., & Sutter, C. (2021). Usability of Predictive Policing for fighting road traffic crashes: An explorative study. In Huckauf, A., Baumann, M., Ernst, M. Herbert, C. Kiefer, M, & Sauter, M. (Eds.): Contributions to the 63rd Tagung Experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (p. 269-270). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

  • Ehlers, J., Kathmann, T., von Heel, E., Sutter, C., Bode, T., Luchmann, I., Dahl, A. & Grahl, M. (2022). Früherkennung von Gefahrenstellen im Straßenverkehr durch Smart Data – FeGiS+. Straßenverkehrstechnik, 03/2022.

  • Heusler B. and Sutter C. (2022). Shoot or Don’t Shoot? Tactical Gaze Control and Visual Attention Training Improves Police Cadets’ Decision-Making Performance in Live-Fire Scenarios. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:798766.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.798766.
    open access: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.798766 (Öffnet in einem neuen Tab)

  • Bramow M., Sutter C. (2022) Fahrradverkehr im Fokus polizeilicher Aufgabenwahrnehmung. In: Wehe D., Siller H. (eds) Handbuch Polizeimanagement. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34394-1_60-1
  • Schönberg, U. & Sutter, C. (2022). Junge schwächere Verkehrsteilnehmende im gemeinsamen Verkehrsraum mit hochautomatisierten Fahrzeugen – zukünftige Handlungsfelder der polizeilichen Verkehrsunfallprävention. Die Polizei, Heft 1/2022, 1-9.
  • Kurtz, M., Oehl, M., & Sutter, C. (2021). “Just one short voice message” – Comparing the effects of text- vs. voice-based answering to text messages via smartphone on young drivers’ driving performances. Safety, 7, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety7030057 Open access
  • Sieveneck, S. & Sutter, C. (2021). Predictive Policing in the context of road traffic safety: a systematic review and theoretical considerations. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspective, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100429 Open access
  • Sutter, C., Bramow, M., Willeke, P., & Stumpen, H.A. (2021). Bundeslagebild Drogen im Straßenverkehr 2018-2020. Arbeitskreis II „Innere Sicherheit“ (Hrsg.). Verschlusssache – Nur für den Dienstgebrauch.

  • Sack, O.S., & Sutter, C. (2020). Temporal persistence of after-effects in the n-1 replication task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1-15. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02073-4. https://rdcu.be/b4YMu (Öffnet in einem neuen Tab)

  • Heusler, B., & Sutter, C. (2020). Gaze Control in Law Enforcement: Comparing a Tactical Police Unit to Patrol Officers. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09412-z (Öffnet in einem neuen Tab)

    Open Access https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11896-020-09412-z (Öffnet in einem neuen Tab)

  • Heusler, B., & Sutter, C. (2020). Gaze Control and Training for High-Stress Situations in Law Enforcement: A Systematic Review. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 35, 401-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09338-1 (Öffnet in einem neuen Tab)

  • Oehl, M., Kamps, M., & Sutter, C. (2019). More Mechanical- Versus More Humanoid-Looking Assistance Robots: How Do Users Rate their Capabilities? - A Study of Younger Versus Older Users. In MuC'19 Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019 (pp. 805-809). https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3344912 (Öffnet in einem neuen Tab)

  • Sutter, C. (2019). Road traffic safety and human errors in automated driving (pp. 140-141). In A. Riener, S. Boll, & A.L. Kun (Eds.): Automotive user interfaces in the age of automation (Dagstuhl Seminar 16262). Dagstuhl Reports, 6, 6. Dagstuhl: Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibnitz-Zentrum für Informatik. http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2016/6758 (Öffnet in einem neuen Tab)

  • Lüdemann, V., Sutter, C., Vogelpohl, K. (2018). Neue Pflichten für Fahrzeugführer beim automatisierten Fahren - eine Analyse aus rechtlicher und verkehrspsychologischer Sicht. Neue Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht (NVZ), 31, 9, 411-417.
    https://beck-online.beck.de/Dokument?VPath=bibdata%2Fzeits%2Fnzv%2F2018%2Fcont%2Fnzv.2018.411.1.htm&readable=Parallelfundstellen&IsSearchRequest=True&HLWords=on (Öffnet in einem neuen Tab)
  • Oehl, M., Stein, J., & Sutter, C. (2017). Handedness Sometimes Matters: Performance Differences When Controlling Integrated Input Devices for Automotive Human-Machine Interfaces. Abstracts of the 29th Association for Psychological Science (APS) Annual Convention, Boston, USA.
  • Sack, O.S., & Sutter, C. (2017). About the role of bottom-up and top-down processes on perception-action interaction in sensorimotor transformations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29 (4), 483-496. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2017.1279165
  • Sormes, M., Stumpen, H.-A., Schweer, B., & Sutter, C. (2017). Effects of announced speed checks on the speed level. In Goschke, T., Bolte, Al. & Kirschbaum, C. (Eds.), Abstracts of the 59th Conference of Experimental Psychologists – TeaP 2017 (p. 331). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers
  • Jeon, M., Politis, I., Shladover, S.E., Sutter, C., Terken, J.M.B., & Poppinga, B. (2016). Towards Life-Long Mobility: Accessible Transportation with Automation. In Proceeding Automotive'UI 16 Adjunct, Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 203-208). New York: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3004323.3004348
  • Mirnig, A.G., Wintersberger, P., Sutter, C., & Ziegler, J. (2016). A Framework for Analyzing and Calibrating Trust in Automated Vehicles. In Proceeding Automotive'UI 16 Adjunct, Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 33-38). New York: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3004323.3004326
  • Oehl, M., Stein, J., Sutter, C. (2016). Left- vs. Right-handed Users’ Performance Controlling Integrated Input Devices – Implications for Automotive HMI. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter Annual Meeting – HFES Europe 2016, Book of Abstracts (pp. 43). Abstract retrieved from http://www.hfes-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/WebBookOfAbstracts2016.pdf
  • Oehl, M., Stein, J., Sutter, C. (2016). Integrierte Eingabegeräte: Sind Links- oder Rechtshänder besser? In S. Franken, U. Schroeder, T. Kuhlen (Hrsg.): Mensch und Computer 2016 – Kurzbeiträge, 4. - 7. September 2016, Aachen. http://dx.doi.org/10.18420/muc2016-mci-0266
  • Oehl, M., Stein, J. & Sutter, C. (2015). Linkshändigkeit als Privileg oder Nachteil bei Notebookeingabegeräten?. In S. Diefenbach, N. Henze & M. Pielot (Hrsg.), Mensch und Computer 2015 Tagungsband (S. 339-342). Stuttgart: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.
  • Oehl, M. & Sutter, C. (2015). Age-related differences in processing visual device and task characteristics when using technical devices. Applied Ergonomics, 48, 214-223.
  • Sutter, C., Drewing, K., & Müsseler, J. (2014, eds.). Special Issue on Multisensory integration in action control. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-142. DOI: 10.3389/978-2-88919-312-7
  • Sutter, C., Drewing, K., & Müsseler, J. (2014). Editorial: multisensory integration in action control. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 544. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00544
  • Wendker, N., Sack, O.S., & Sutter, C. (2014). Visual target distance, but not visual cursor path length produces shifts in motor behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 225. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00225
  • Ladwig, S., Sutter, C., & Müsseler, J. (2013). Intra- and intermodal integration of discrepant visual and proprioceptive action effects. Experimental Brain Research, 231, 457-468.
  • Oehl, M., Dahlmanns, L., & Sutter, C. (2013). Small input devices used by the elderly – How sensorimotor transformation and task complexity affect interaction. In C. Stephanidis, & M. Antona (Eds.), UAHCI/HCII 2013, Part II, LNCS 8010 (pp. 181-190). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  • Sutter, C., Sülzenbrück, S., Rieger, M., & Müsseler, J. (2013). Limitations of distal effect anticipation when using tools. New Ideas in Psychology, 31, 247-257.
  • Ladwig, S., Sutter, C., & Müsseler, J. (2012). Crosstalk between proximal and distal action effects when using a tool. Journal of Psychology, 220, 10-15. Datensatzbezeichnung ZPID: SNLG230412_1
  • Müsseler, J., & Sutter, C. (2012). Menschliche Informationsverarbeitung beim Werkzeuggebrauch: Zur Koordination proximaler und distaler Handlungseffekte. In Schmitz, T. H. & Groninger, H. (Hrsg.): Manuelle Intelligenz und Transmedialiät kreativer Prozesse (S. 247-261). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
  • Sutter, C. (2012). Koordination proximaler und distaler Handlungseffekte bei transformierten Bewegungen. Habilitationsschrift, RWTH Aachen.
  • Sutter, C., & Ladwig, S. (2012). Mirrored visual feedback limits distal effect anticipation. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 247-258.
  • Sutter, C., Ladwig, S., Oehl, M., & Müsseler, J. (2012). Age effects on controlling tools with sensorimotor transformations. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 573. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00573
  • Sutter, C., & Sülzenbrück, S. (2012, eds.). Special Issue on Perceiving transformed movements when using tools. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 2, 163-339.
  • Sutter, C., & Sülzenbrück, S. (2012). Perceiving transformed movements when using tools. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 163-167.
  • Völker, S., Sutter, C., Wang, L. & Borchers, J. (2012). Understanding flicking on curved surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '12 (pp. 189-198). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Wang, L., Sutter, C., Müsseler, J., Dangel, R. J. Z., Disselhorst-Klug, C. (2012). Perceiving one‘s own limb movements with conflicting sensory feedback: the role of mode of movement control and age. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 289. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00289
  • Heber, I.A., Oehl, M., & Sutter, C. (2011). Performance and comfort when using motion-controlled tools in complex tasks. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Posters, Part II, HCII 2011, Communications in Computer and Information Sciences 174 (pp. 335-339). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  • Sutter, C., Müsseler, J. & Bardos, L. (2011). Effects of sensorimotor transformations with graphical input devices. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30, 415-424.
  • Sutter, C., Oehl, M. & Armbrüster, C. (2011). Practice and carryover effects when using small interaction devices. Applied Ergonomics, 42, 437-444.
  • Sutter, C. & Müsseler, J. (2010). Action control while seeing mirror images of one’s own movements: Effects of perspective on spatial compatibility. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1757-1769.
  • Sutter, C. & Oehl, M. (2010). Of age effects and the role of psychomotor abilities and practice when using interaction devices. In T. Marek, W. Karwowski, & V. Rice (Eds.), Advances in Understanding Human Performance: Neuroergonomics, Human Factors Design, and Special Populations (pp. 757-766). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Weiss, M., Völker, S., Sutter, C., & Borchers, J. (2010). BendDesk: dragging across the curve. In ITS '10: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (pp. 1-10). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Müsseler, J. & Sutter, C. (2009). Perceiving one’s own movements when using a tool. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 359-365.
  • Sutter, C. (2008). Eingabegeräte und Softwareoberflächen von Notebooks: Grundlagen, Methoden und Empfehlungen zur Optimierung der Mensch-Computer Interaktion unter Berücksichtigung von Expertise und Alter des Nutzers. Saarbrücken: Vdm Verlag Dr. Müller.
  • Sutter, C., Armbrüster, C., Oehl, M. & Müsseler, J. (2008). Office work place with laptop computers: User specific requirements for input devices and software design. In W. Karwowski & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Conference Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (CD-Rom, 5 pages). USA Publishing.
  • Sutter, C., Müsseler, J., Bardos, L., Ballagas, R. & Borchers, J. (2008). The impact of gain change on perceiving one’s own actions. In M. Herczeg & M.C. Kindsmüller (Eds.). Mensch & Computer 2008 (pp. 147-156). München, Germany: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.
  • Armbrüster, C., Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2007). Notebook input devices put to the age test: The usability of trackpoint and touchpad for middle-aged adults. Ergonomics, 50, 426-445.
  • Oehl, M., Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2007). Considerations on efficient touch interfaces – How display size influences the performance in an applied pointing task. In M.J. Smith & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human Interface, Part I, HCII 2007, LNCS 4557 (pp. 136-143). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Sutter, C. (2007). Sensumotor transformation of input devices and the impact on practice and task difficulty. Ergonomics, 50, 1999-2016.
  • Sutter, C. (2007). How users with RSI review the usability of notebook input devices. In M.J. Dainoff (Ed.), Ergonomics and Health Aspects, HCII 2007, LNCS 4566 (pp. 319-328). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Sutter, C. & Müsseler, J. (2007). User specific design of interfaces and interaction techniques: What do older computer users need? In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2007, LNCS 4554 (pp. 1020-1029). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Sutter, C. (2006). Charakteristische Nutzereigenschaften und ihr Einfluss auf die Bedienung von Notebook-Eingabegeräten: Eine arbeitspsychologische Evaluation von Touchpad und Trackpoint [Specific user characteristics and their impact on the usage of notebook-input devices: a work psychological evalutation of touchpad and trackpoint].
  • Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2006). Impact of practice and age on motor performance of mouse users. In Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association 16th World Congress. Elsevier. CD-Rom (6 pages).
  • Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2006). Psychomotor performance of input device users and optimized cursor control. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, 742-746.
  • Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2005). Interacting with notebook input devices: An analysis of motor performance and user’s expertise. Human Factors, 47 (1), 169-187.
  • Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2005). Psychomotor user characteristics as predictors for a successful usage of small input devices. In Proceedings of the HCI International 2005. St.Louis, MO: Mira Digital Publishing. CD-Rom (10 pages).
  • Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2005). The usage of notebook input devices in the context of RSI risks. In Proceedings of the HCI International 2005. St.Louis, MO: Mira Digital Publishing. CD-Rom (10 pages).
  • Armbrüster, C., Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2004). Target size and target distance: Important factors for designing interfaces for older adults. Work with Computing Systems. Kuala Lumpur: Damai Sciences, 454-459.
  • Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2004). Accuracy measures of cursor movement path validated on notebook input devices. Work with Computing Systems. Kuala Lumpur: Damai Sciences, 523-528.
  • Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2004). Psychomotor efficiency in users of notebook input devices: Confirmation and restrictions of Fitts’ law as an evaluative tool for user-friendly design. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, 773-777.
  • Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2003). How to handle notebook input devices: An insight in button use strategy. In P.T. McCabe (Ed.). Contemporary Ergonomics. London: Taylor & Francis, 241-246.
  • Sutter, C. & Ziefle, M. (2003). Health hazard from input devices: The diagnostics of muscular load and motor performance revisited. In H. Luczak and K.J. Zink (Eds.), Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management. Santa Monica: IEA Press, 525-530.
  • 40 Abstracts von Vorträgen und Posterpräsentationen auf nationalen und internationalen Konferenzen
EN

Erläuterungen und Hinweise